? Step 1: Read and observe carefully. Try to answer these questions: 1. What do you see in the photo? 2. What is the design intention of the teacher who created this environment? 3. Did these designs play the expected role?
Step 2: Think synchronously. Compare our questions and doubts about the cases written in the book with your own ideas and try to answer these questions: 1. Are these questions reasonable? 2. Does the creation of this wall reflect autonomy, interactivity and exploration?
Step 3: 1. Do you agree with our judgment on this case? 2. Have you found any other problems?
Today, we mainly look at case 1 to case 12. These cases were taken by the editor-in-chief who analyzed the live photos. From these cases, I draw the following conclusions: 1. Keep the "fragments" in order. 2. Make the presentation of the problem intuitive. 3. Make the wall a tool for children to play. 4. Make the appreciated resources touchable, operable and complementary. 5. Make children's records easier to understand and have connections.
Reggio's educational philosophy once mentioned: "Let children's eyes cross the fence", but in reality, we often have the phenomenon that the environment creates a window. In this case, it is necessary for us to consider its appropriateness and necessity. The theme wall should be more clear and intuitive when displaying records. The presentation of scientific activities should be a combination of tangible life and science, from a single representation to multiple expressions, which makes the understanding of regional rules simpler and more natural. The teacher's default is a little late, paying attention to children's interests and differences, and highlighting the autonomy of age characteristics.