Of course, this "no money" is relative, and the economic foundation is relatively weak, not without a penny. If you don't have a penny, don't say that you have a baby and are starving.

I have to admit that having no money to have children will make children suffer, and parents will feel indebted to their children, but this is not the reason why they cannot have children.

First of all, we must clarify an idea, which is the most fundamental basis for parents to raise their children.

In the minds of many parents, raising children means giving them superior living conditions and rich material foundation. This is a wrong idea, a serious mistake.

In terms of material, it is the most important standard to ensure the healthy and healthy growth of children. If you can't even guarantee food and clothing for your children, it's really not suitable for raising children. But if you can ensure that your child has a material foundation for healthy growth, then the main problem will first solve the economic and material concerns.

Furthermore, we must ensure that children can have a complete educational process.

In fact, as long as the first point is guaranteed, education is compulsory now, and parents don't have to worry until junior high school.

The difference lies in the difference between private schools and public schools, and between aristocratic schools and ordinary schools, but this difference is not much different for children with good family education. Only when family education is lacking, that is, parents' ability to educate their children is weak, so-called "aristocratic" schools are needed to find some balance.

Third, and most importantly, the cultivation of children's outlook on life and values is the key to raising children.

This heavy responsibility falls on parents, and it is more up to parents to give their children a correct outlook on life and values.

And this matter is not measured by economic level.

There are many examples in life. Chinese-style "giant babies" are children educated by typical parents' ignorance. There is a strange imagination that the richer ignorant parents are, the easier it is to raise such "giant babies", but these "giant babies" have more sources of life than those raised by ignorant parents who have no money, so the rich "giant babies" live more chic.

In this case, can we say that they have no money? Not only money, but also a lot.

So having children has nothing to do with having money or not. "Don't have children without money" is a fallacy, just an excuse for "out of stock" parents who want to have children.

I saw a news the other day that a mother had given birth to eight daughters. In order to have a son, she gave birth to the ninth child, and finally her dream came true!

But before I was happy, my mother went directly to the ICU for rescue. She was diagnosed by doctors as intrauterine infection, thalassemia, hypoproteinemia, renal insufficiency and other complications. Due to malnutrition, the child has to live in an incubator. The mother and son spend nearly 10 thousand a day, but their house is surrounded by a wall, so they go online for help. Netizens saw 9 babies. I can't sympathize at all.

Why not have children if you have no money?

It is difficult to guarantee the quality of life of children.

"The poorer, the poorer." The result of this vicious circle is. Just like the family mentioned at the beginning of the article, a poor family with many children, whose children don't even have decent clothes. They usually sleep on the floor, eat mostly white water, and rarely eat meat. In such a living environment, children are raised sallow and emaciated, and some are malnourished.

It is difficult to guarantee the quality of children's education.

In today's society, it is no longer the time to feed a baby with a pair of chopsticks. It's getting harder and harder to give birth to a precious child, because all families with conditions in the city will find ways to give their children a good education, such as various interest classes and remedial classes, so as to improve their grades and let them stay ahead of others in the race. And all this, without economic strength as the foundation, is impossible to have.

If you have children, you should be responsible for their future.

Children are not the private property of parents. If they have children, they must be responsible for their future. If parents can create better living and educational conditions for their children, the pressure on children will be much less.

If the child is born again and is not raised, it will be even harder if he grows up without a good education.

Therefore, it is not impossible to have children without money, but to have fewer children, give yourself and reduce the burden on society.

I think what Fiona Fang thinks, (joke, manual joke)

First of all, there are different interpretations of the concept of no money. So what is no money? I believe that many young people who have no money now just don't have enough money to give their children an ideal life.

No money, no children. Sometimes it's more like a false proposition that is too decisive and easy to stand and talk.

But this is also a worry and a little despair about the rising cost of raising a baby.

The children have a new nickname: golden swallow with four legs.

Except that most of the time it makes people laugh and cry, this gold-swallowing beast can be described as first-class in technology-diapers cost money, milk powder costs money, early education costs money, eating costs money, clothes change quickly, people need to accompany you, taking up your precious rest time and affecting your former two-person world. ...

It is indeed the inequality between the expectation of a better life and reality that leads to the concern about whether to raise children.

But it is definitely not the reason to choose Dink (not having children).

Having children is the choice of life. The statement "Don't have children without money" is obviously too extreme and irresponsible. Perhaps not having children has little impact on our present life, but when we get old, the companionship of children and the vivid life of sadness and joy brought by ta can be reflected at once. Many Dink families regret it after entering middle age. After all, children are a part of life.

If a person drinks water, he knows a lot about water. Everyone's situation is different. You should choose your own life. Baby, I wish everyone a choice without regrets.

I think, no matter what others say, childbearing is personal freedom and should be decided by both men and women who decide to have children.

1. My choice

Of course, I personally think so.

It is often said that children can be raised poor or rich, and they can be raised in any way. But the key is to see what state you can accept.

Personally, I don't think about having children if there is no relatively stable income at home.

Because how can two people live without children? As long as two people work hard, they won't go hungry. But having a baby is different. First of all, both sides should have a physical examination, recuperate their bodies, supplement nutrition during pregnancy, have a prenatal examination, and buy all kinds of maternal and child products when the child is born, all of which are just needed and cost money.

I can buy less clothes without skin care products and cosmetics, and clothes for children can be cheaper in buy buy, but I can't stand the state that buying milk powder for children and buying books have to be entangled.

I attach importance to education. I want to give my children early education and bilingual enlightenment. I want to take my children with me and try to give them a better living environment and social environment.

You see, everything needs money. Without money to live, we can only give up our high expectations and make do with everything. This is unacceptable to me. I'd rather not have children.

The above is my consideration. I gave birth to a child last year and now I am one year old. I'm taking my children to my husband's party, and my mother-in-law is helping me with my children. I am looking for a job.

But not everyone has to think so. Everyone goes his own way and makes his own judgment.

I happen to have two other friends around me, which is completely different from my state.

2. Bitter before sweet

A friend graduated from junior high school, worked in a southern factory, and met her husband. She got pregnant soon after she got married, and neither of them saved any money. Shortly after pregnancy, my friend resigned and went back to his hometown. Later, the baby was born soon, and her husband resigned and went back.

Their idea is that parents must be around when the child is born. In order to take care of the family, the husband sold China steamed buns near his home for half a year, barely making ends meet.

But my friend's confinement money is gone, and my husband's family can't help. Friends had to borrow money from their parents to tide over the difficulties.

After the second month, she went back to her mother's house and asked her mother to help her take care of the children. Her husband went out to work and sent money home. She nursed her baby at home until she was one and a half years old. She left her children at home, looked after her mother by herself and went to work in the south with her husband.

They used to spend a lot of money. Because they had children, they didn't go out for entertainment for a year. They basically don't go shopping, buy clothes or eat out. They buy food, cook and rent houses every day.

Give your mother 1 0,000 yuan every month to calculate the cost of raising a baby. Rural areas also save money relatively. Her husband hasn't returned to his hometown for three years. Every Spring Festival, she will go home for about ten days to look after the children.

Young couples who work hard also work hard for their children and their mothers. For more than two years, they saved more than 100,000 yuan, used the borrowed money to make up the down payment, and borrowed money to buy a house in the southern town where they worked.

Now the children are in the middle class in their hometown kindergarten, and the house has just been renovated. They are going to take their children to a large class for 20 years, and it is also a bitter experience for a family of three to reunite.

It will be very hard in the future, but at last the children don't have to be left behind.

3. Being together is more important

Another friend, husband and wife live in our small northern county, with an average salary, two children, living with in-laws, and a family of six living in two rooms and one living room.

Hard work is bound to be hard. My friend only ate fish once in her second child's confinement, and even seldom bought food. Most of them are wild vegetables picked by her father-in-law outside.

It is also that her second child has no milk, and the child was weaned early and handed over to her grandmother. She goes to work in the factory in the town where the industrial zone is located and goes home once a week to see the children.

Her husband works at the construction site, most of the time he is not at home, and his income is unstable. My father-in-law is still working. Although a large family works hard, they have at least three incomes to support each other, which is enough.

But big houses are hard to change.

You see, this is the different choice of the three of us.

I also know that many ordinary couples living in first-and second-tier cities work hard and only dare to have one child, just to let their children receive a better education.

Whether the poor or the rich should have children should not be a problem.

The question should be, under the current economic conditions, do we want to have children? How to raise a child? Generally consult before making a decision.

Because having children is a systematic project, it will affect the lives of at least three generations, so everyone who makes decisions needs to be cautious and responsible.

How can I put it? In today's society, raising a child really requires a lot of energy, money, physical examination, a lot of money and various expenses. I don't want to treat him badly. I want to give him the best, and my personal ability is limited. I really want it after thinking about it. It depends on your personal conditions. If you want to have your last meal, forget it. Make money first and then save some money to say something else!