Basically, nothing has changed. What your children learn at how old will naturally be understood by other children. No one needs to know more about rote learning.
Don't let the children lose at the starting line.
Memorizing Chinese characters, memorizing words, learning English, learning piano, learning painting, etc., the sooner children start, the better, so as to leave other children far behind. Other children can't recognize Chinese characters, and their children have learned hundreds of Chinese characters through early education classes, which makes their mother very gratified and honored. After all, this is their own credit-they can realize the importance of early education.
However, the awareness of parents has already made children lose at the starting line. Everyone knows the story of the race between the tortoise and the hare, but no one knows that even if the hare lets the tortoise run first for a while, if the tortoise doesn't get faster in the end, it can't outrun the hare.
Most parents teach turtles how to run first. Parents who really understand early education teach turtles how to acquire the ability of rabbits and even how to become rabbits. It seems that other people's children are marking time, but they are actually accumulating strength.
Do you really think the tortoise finally won the tortoise-rabbit race? Parents should be realistic. Early education can't paralyze itself with fantasy results.
Parents who equate early education with letting their children learn more "superficial knowledge" (such as memory literacy, gifted piano playing, skilled swimming, etc.). In fact, it is not early education, but a phased comparison and delay of children's due growth.
All the contents of early education are determined by parents' own experiences, not by parents' observation and self-thinking. Parents have never thought deeply about what abilities their children need to cultivate at this stage.
Let imaginative and creative children memorize Chinese characters and recite the addition within 100. Although he doesn't understand, he can do it. What are the consequences? The imaginary space is full of solidified knowledge.
Parents who teach themselves early education can only see the children's behavior process, while parents who don't know early education can only see those results: Wow, children have learned to play the piano and can already remember hundreds of words, which is great.
This is the difference between teaching people to fish and teaching people to fish. The former is to teach children how to fish, and the latter is to teach children how to ask for fish. The former is to teach children how to run faster (like rabbits), and the latter is to teach children how to run faster (at the speed of turtles).
Why do some children who have received early education get tired of learning when they get to primary school or junior high school?
I have learned so much before, and now there is more to learn. I am stressed, irritable and afraid of family disappointment.
Why do some children study so easily and are still excellent?
Learning is not their whole life. They are under pressure but know how to adjust their mentality, open-minded and good at summing up methods and experiences.
Children's starting line has always been their parents. The key to determining whether children run fast or slow is whether parents have early education for themselves, followed by early education for their children.
Blind early education is self-inflicted, it is better not to teach early education.