In fact, I think that as long as family conditions permit, and I have the confidence to educate my children well and have a harmonious family relationship, I can have a second child. In my eyes, a man and a woman are the best, which just adds up to a good word. Of course, I'm not saying that having two women or two men is not good. I don't think there should be such a big difference in the length of having a second child.
? Like some of my classmates, they are all twenty years old, and their brothers and sisters are all born. The difference is too big. Apart from the generation gap between them, the older one should not only earn money to support his family and foster parents, but also shoulder the heavy responsibility of sending his younger brothers and sisters to school. Their burden is too heavy. I think the age difference of the second child is almost 3-5 years.
? The introduction of the second child policy is actually to solve many family problems. There are also some only children, because they are usually spoiled, and it is inevitable that they will be more willful. If you have a second child, parents' love will be scattered and balanced, and the two children can also check and balance each other and learn like the good one. By contrast, children who have a second child have a better personality than the only child. Only children can be a little selfish and spoiled.
Another point is to liberalize the second child policy. Give the elderly a sense of security and dependence. It is much easier for two people to share the responsibility for providing for the aged than for themselves. Giving birth to a second child is actually to decompress the child. So I'm in favor of having a second child. ?