Current location - Training Enrollment Network - Books and materials - How to write the summary of the opening report?
How to write the summary of the opening report?
Literature review of the opening report, including the purpose, basis and significance of studying this topic, current research level, development trends at home and abroad, preliminary work or knowledge gaps in related fields, research objectives and plans, research methods and means to be adopted, expected results and working conditions required for research work, possible difficulties and solutions and measures.

The required research funds and economic (economic benefit) analysis, the workload of the paper and the research work plan, the theoretical level and ability of the subject, the guiding force, etc. Structurally, it mainly consists of four parts, 1, literature review, 2, research ideas, research methods and means, 3, references, 4, schedule. Literature review is the most important part of the opening report.

Writing skills of literature review

1. Literature review should not be a repetition, listing and general introduction of existing literature, but a critical analysis and comment on the advantages and disadvantages and contributions of previous studies. Therefore, the literature review should contain the dual meanings of comprehensive refining and analytical review.

2. Literature review should be concise, avoid quoting a large number of original texts as much as possible, make the author's views clear in his own language, and draw general conclusions from the original documents.

3. Literature review is not a database. It should closely focus on the "problems" of the subject research and ensure that the existing research results are directly related to the subject research. Its content is closely organized around the theme, which can not only systematically and comprehensively reflect the history, present situation and trend of the research object, but also reflect all aspects of the research content.

4. Literature review should be comprehensive, accurate and objective, and the opinions and arguments used for comments should preferably come from a single document, and try to avoid using others' explanations or reviews of the original documents.