It's hard to say. It is possible to find a new reviewer, but it is more likely to be the original reviewer. Of course, the editor may have made it himself.

Comments are a function of editors. The editor's work of judging, identifying and evaluating the materials (manuscripts) such as words and images created by the author (for the review of translated manuscripts, it is mainly to identify the quality of translation) consists of two parts: reviewing manuscripts and writing review reports. Also known as censorship. Peer review is the key to editing work and an important step to determine the quality of books.

The review of all kinds of manuscripts usually adopts a three-level review system: preliminary review, review and final review.

Preliminary inspection/inspection

It is required to read through the manuscript and put forward basic evaluation and handling opinions.

take a reexamination

It is required to review the preliminary examination opinions, judge their correctness and solve the unresolved problems in the preliminary examination.

Make a final judgment

A final decision should be made on the quality and acceptability of the manuscript. Third-level reviewers should have written review opinions, which is an important record in the process of manuscript editing, an important part of manuscript files and an important basis for professional assessment of editors at all levels.