Article 24 of the Archives Law of People's Republic of China (PRC): In case of any of the following acts, the archives administration department of the people's government at or above the county level and the relevant competent departments shall give administrative sanctions to the directly responsible person in charge or other directly responsible personnel according to law; If the case constitutes a crime, criminal responsibility shall be investigated according to law:

1, damage or loss of state-owned archives;

2. Providing, transcribing, publishing or destroying state-owned archives without authorization;

3. Altering or forging documents;

4. Selling or transferring archives owned by the state without authorization in violation of the provisions of Article 17 of this Law;

5. Selling or giving away archives to foreigners or foreign organizations;

6, in violation of the provisions of Article 10 and Article 11 of this law, failing to file or hand over the files as required;

7. Failing to take measures knowing that the saved documents are dangerous, resulting in the loss of documents;

8, the archives staff dereliction of duty, resulting in the loss of archives.

Extended data

Through the analysis of many cases, it can be found that file fraud usually occurs in the early days of discipline inspection cadres in politics, and the grassroots are often high-risk areas for file fraud. For higher-ranking officials, supervision from inside and outside the system is more comprehensive, and there is relatively less room for fraud, but they also gain more power and ability to turn false files into "established facts." Once the fraud is successful, the counterfeiter may "cheat the organization for a long time" like Lu Enguang.

For ordinary people, files are just documents that record life experiences. With the increasing population mobility, many people don't understand the practical significance of archives. However, for public officials, files are still the lifeblood.

Age, resume, education background and time of joining the party are all important indicators that affect the promotion of officials. Lu Enguang changed from a private enterprise boss to a deputy ministerial official step by step. Without the blessing of fake files on him, I'm afraid it would be difficult to go so smoothly.

If archives become a kind of capital and indicator, then, like all indicators, no matter how dense the barriers to maintaining the truth are, even if there is only a gap, some people will try their best to falsify.

The more "heavy" the archives are, the less "serious" some people look at the archives. Only by breaking the mystery and ritual sense of archives and returning to the basic function of recording a person's true resume can we curb fraud conceptually.

What counterfeiters fabricate is not files, but the interests that files point to. As a matter of fact, the practice of rigidly evaluating a cadre's political achievements and ability with archival indicators is no longer in line with the needs of the times.

Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, Party organs at all levels, such as the Central Organization Department, have clearly stated that the age of leadership positions cannot be "one size fits all". In the list of national excellent county party secretaries commended in 20 15, people born after 70 are sometimes 40 years old, and those born after 50 are sometimes 59 years old. The selection and appointment of cadres has played down the age limit, allowing cadres who meet the basic conditions to compete on an equal footing, and there is no chance of age fraud.

People's Network-Beware of file fraud and start from the grassroots.