Using his portrait without his consent shows that the infringer does not respect the personal interests of others' portraits, and his behavior undermines the personal exclusiveness and integrity of others' portraits and should be punished. If the portrait is used with my consent, it does not constitute an infringement of the right to portrait.
Infringement of portrait rights must be for profit. For the purpose of making profits, it refers to using someone's portrait to attract customers, promote goods, or directly make or copy the portrait into goods for sale. Using other people's portraits for profit without other people's consent not only damages the personality of the obligee, but also damages the obligee's right to obtain material benefits because others use their portraits for commercial activities, which is not allowed in law.