The first is the recent distressing events. A history teacher in Henan suffered an organized explosion in the online classroom. He entered the classroom through a shared online classroom link, played music and insulted the teacher. Unfortunately, our history teacher was found dead at home shortly after this group of strangers invaded the online classroom. [Pray] [Pray] [Pray]
The second thing is that when a community secretary in Zhengzhou made a report at the press conference on epidemic prevention and control, he mentioned emotionally that he missed the adult ceremony of his 18-year-old daughter because of the epidemic work, so he was ridiculed by the group on any occasion, which was inappropriate.
The third is a video shot by a mobile phone that recently broke out on the Internet. A professor and doctoral supervisor answered the phone in the library and was kindly reminded by his classmates. She became angry and gossiping, trying to prove that she was right, but her classmates harassed her. Later, the school issued a notice saying that "teachers have been psychologically counseled and students have been criticized and educated", which is also quite intriguing.
The above message did not mention the names of the parties, but only made a brief description. Seeing these news, many people should be as angry and puzzled as me at the first time. The first "online classroom explosion" was a pure cyber violence, which led to the death of a hard-working teacher in the front line. It is said that afterwards, someone sneaked into the group chat of the online class blaster and found that most of the group chats were minors, which showed no concern for the teacher's death. The second "secretary of the rite of passage" is nothing more than the fact that the secretary did not really go deep into the masses. During the epidemic, everyone has difficulties, whether it is frontline epidemic prevention personnel or ordinary people who strictly abide by epidemic prevention policies. Besides, in China, there are many families who don't have the concept of bar mitzvah, so it's really hard for the secretary's speech to generate * * *. However, the subsequent development was not simple. After the incident, some netizens found the secretary's personal information according to his name and bombarded him with SMS. I just realized that this person is just an innocent passerby with the same name. The same is true of the third "library incident". "omnipotent" netizens quickly dig out the information of the teachers involved and leave a message on the Internet, which will definitely "explode"!
In fact, most netizens know what I want to say, that is, cyber violence, which has always been a problem in the information age.
In recent years, cyber violence has emerged one after another, and most people are angry but helpless about it. But in fact, many people, like me, participated in cyber violence intentionally or unintentionally and became people they hated. Think about it. Have you ever commented, "Why didn't this man die? He deserved it "and" How did this man die? "
In the information age, we can express our opinions at will as long as we move our fingers, but can we really be responsible for everything we say? We all fantasize about guiding the chivalrous life in the Jianghu, but there is still a saying, "I don't know the whole picture, don't comment!" " Speak with your feet and do more! It seems that we are irresponsible for what we say and do online. While expressing our opinions at will, we participated in the violence intentionally or unintentionally. Imagine that if a society really needs us ordinary people to uphold justice, then this society is already in jeopardy!
Of course, from now on, I am not timid on the Internet. Here, I want to talk about the thoughts of some netizens. Since the emergence of the Internet, some events that can't get on the table and are suppressed have appeared in public view, which has promoted social progress and punished evil. Some well-meaning netizens always think of using the power of public opinion to solve things when they encounter them.
There is an essential difference between creating public opinion and cyber violence here. Creating public opinion only expresses opinions on the incident itself, while cyber violence is a pure personal attack. Worried that something will be suppressed if it is not solved, creating public opinion is undoubtedly a good move in the information age, while cyber violence is pure violence. Violence under the pretext of justice is harmful!
Here, I hope the relevant departments will implement the online real-name registration system and related laws as soon as possible, and people need to be responsible for their words and deeds! The internet is not a place of extra-legality, so don't make excuses for violence!
If you have any questions about the self-taught/adult-taught examination, don't know the contents of the test sites for self-taught/adult-taught examination, and don't know the local policies for self-taught/adult-taught examination, click on Mr. official website at the bottom to get the review materials for free: /xl/