1 (the first level of consciousness) In our opinion, there is a gap between God, man and apple. Think of it this way. A complete apple is regarded as love, and no apple is regarded as emptiness. In these two absolute cases, is there any return? Do you owe it or not? Without absolute existence, absolute non-existence is meaningless. Taking an apple without a bite as the goal of life can be understood as looking for that incomplete love all one's life. It can also be understood that a person's life is just to prove greater love.
2 (Middle Consciousness) Similarly, the gap between God and us (we are the apple itself) represents a blank in our memory, or that we know our self, not the real me. I can be aware of my existence from the moment I was born, but this awareness of my existence does not exist in my own brain thinking. In short, everyone has a period of no memory after birth. When I can know myself and have a memory, it is the cognition of the subjective consciousness of the external objective world, which is a conscious thinking process from the outside to the inside. Over time, such self-knowledge is deeply rooted, and the lost memories have long been forgotten. This is the chipped apple. Life needs both internal training and external training. Enlightenment is the return of inner fundamental consciousness.
3 (high-level consciousness) is a person with this level of consciousness, and he will naturally understand. God, Apple and the people mentioned in the question. It is a whole. On the other hand, understanding these three levels, when a person reaches the level of 1, it is impossible to subjectively judge the possibility and certainty of level 2. Those who have reached the second level cannot subjectively understand and judge the possibility and certainty of determining the third level. On the road of life, through a series of external practices, it has produced a series of internal influences. To put it simply, the external understanding of the material world in society has been transformed into the internal subjective consciousness, and the simple self and the complex society are always choosing or escaping from each other, so that I can adapt to this society which I think is good or bad. This is tantamount to changing my inner consciousness completely according to the change of external material. Such a level of consciousness is the level of consciousness, and the potential level of consciousness is not thought of and perceived by people.
Let me make a simple diagram: people → (external behavior direction) (internal cultivation) ← people → (equivalence)
→ (ideology) → (epistemology) → (equivalence)
The words are not clear. If you can't reach it, the more treatment you write, the harder it is to understand. What you learn is not enlightenment, there is a difference.