Generally speaking, many people in society get master's degrees, that is, students get master's degrees at school, and basically they take more tests on theory. Of course, for example, all students in school are like that, and a large number of students think that it is good to take a master's degree, because professional libraries generally only take one professional course and then take a political course, so there is little review pressure, but if they take a master's degree, they will have to add one English and one mathematics.
Why are so many people willing to take an academic master's degree? Because the risk of re-examination of academic masters is relatively low, and then its development prospects are relatively good, because academic masters can take doctoral exams, professional masters can't, and masters can't take doctoral exams. The highest is about two years after graduating from a professional master's degree. If you are successful, you can graduate, and then you can directly enter social work with your academic qualifications. However, you can take a Ph.D. exam for an academic master, and then the academic master is basically full-time.
The question of who is good or bad is to see what you really want. If you want to enter social work directly, you will have a degree promotion in about two years, and then your practical ability and knowledge will increase again. The pressure on you to take a master's degree is not too great, that is, the elimination ratio may be higher during the second interview, but if you are interested in taking a doctor's degree, you must take a master's degree. Because professional experts are not allowed.