If some students maliciously occupy seats in the library and the postgraduate entrance examination party, it is definitely not good, but if they occupy seats reasonably, I think it is all the same. In fact, there is no problem of equality and inequality, but if you don't go because you occupy a seat, or haven't been there, then this situation is very uncomfortable. You can go out in the middle and put your things there. But if you ask someone else to do it for you, but you never go, this behavior is very outrageous. Doing this maliciously is different from doing this normally. If you just want to satisfy your inner pleasure or your inner sense of deformity, then this kind of behavior is not recommended, but if you want to study and have high-quality reading habits, this kind of behavior is ok.

But for us, how to distinguish between malicious seat occupation and ordinary seat occupation is a very important problem, but for many people, we can't say clearly, that is, for some people, taking a seat in the library may just want to keep a balance in their hearts, not for learning.

For most students, they know it's a pity not to go to school, but they don't want to study, which causes the phenomenon that most students want to occupy a seat in the library, but they don't. For most people, this malicious seat occupation is actually very uncomfortable.

If we can rectify this phenomenon, each of us can study hard, but for some students who take the postgraduate entrance examination, they sometimes take seats maliciously, so we treat some students' behavior of grabbing seats in the library and the postgraduate entrance examination party. I think it's definitely not good to occupy a seat maliciously, but if it's reasonable to study by occupying a seat, then everyone is equal in knowledge, and we can accept such behavior.