Students always make some common mistakes when writing literature review. Knowing in advance can avoid them as much as possible. The following is an analysis of the problems in the literature review I recommended for you, hoping to help you. More exciting content can be viewed (wwww.oh 100.com/bylw).
1. The literature collection is incomplete and the key points are omitted.
Some graduate students fail to fully incorporate representative materials into the research scope due to improper data collection scope or methods, or choose materials only according to their own preferences. As a result, we can't systematically and comprehensively grasp the research status quo, or unilaterally understand other people's research results, thus blindly thinking that a certain problem or field has not been studied, making our own research a kind of repetitive work. Therefore, before writing a summary, it is necessary to collect information comprehensively, and the research of degree thesis is more important? I will be able to master professional knowledge and read all professional books. I really have something to read written by foreigners. .
2. Literature reading is not in-depth, simply listed,? Comprehensive? Instead of? Say?
When writing a summary, we must fully understand the existing research viewpoints and accurately express them with reasonable logic (either in time order, or in memory logic of viewpoints, similarity degree, etc.). ). If the review only lists the views of predecessors without systematic classification, induction and refinement, then the content will be very messy and lack of internal logic. This is not conducive to clarifying the relationship between the existing research results, and it is also difficult to recognize the development context, in-depth research and existing problems of a problem, let alone go to the forefront of problem research.
If so? Comprehensive? Instead of? Say? Then, even if the content is systematic, at best, it is only a statement of other people's views, and it cannot achieve the purpose of finding and establishing the theme of the paper through analysis and comment.
3. Personal opinions are the main body of comments.
Some graduate students just skim through the research status quo in the summary, comment on it with a lot of space, and then put forward their own research ideas. Therefore, literature review is written as a review or research plan.
Literature review is mainly to sort out the research status and trends of related disciplines, clarify the research status, progress and predicament, and provide reference for follow-up research. So, what is the focus of review? Comprehensive? That is, its main part should be an objective interpretation and analysis of previous views; Personal opinion is appropriate? Say? ,, can play the role of making the finishing point comments or enlightenment, but it should not be the main body. In addition, summarizing and refining the viewpoints must be based on the original documents, and the viewpoints cannot be imposed on the original authors; If you have different opinions, you can comment on the original author's opinions, but the arguments must be sufficient, and readers can distinguish the original author's opinions from the reviewers' own opinions, and they cannot be mixed together.
4. Avoid the heavy, and deliberately highlight the importance of your own research.
As mentioned above, the purpose of graduate students writing summaries is to find the breakthrough point and breakthrough point of dissertation research. Some graduate students still find it difficult to find problems after completing the review, so they think there is no problem to study in this respect. In order to complete their own papers, they deliberately omitted or weakened some research results in the review, or magnified the shortcomings of existing research to highlight the value and significance of their own research. This result can only be repeated research, and its innovation can be imagined. In fact, there are many reasons why the problem cannot be found. It may be that their academic accumulation is not enough or their thoughts are not profound; Maybe the topic is inappropriate, too big or too small; Could it be that the discipline is developing? Plateau period? . However, not finding a problem does not mean that there is no problem, let alone casually perfunctory with a studied problem. If it is their own reasons, graduate students should strive to improve their own level under the guidance of their tutors, calm down and think deeply and complete the topic selection; If it is a problem of discipline development, we can try to complete the topic selection by opening up new fields, using new methods and providing new materials.
Descriptive format of academic papers and references
1. Monograph: [serial number] author. Title [M]. Version (1 version is not recorded). Place of publication: publisher, year of publication. Start and end page numbers.
2. Journal: [serial number] author. Title [J] Publication name, year, volume (issue): page number.
3. Proceedings of the conference (or compilation): [serial number] author, title [A], editor, name of proceedings [C], place of publication: publishing house, year of publication, starting and ending page numbers.
4. Dissertation: [serial number] author. Title [D] Address of degree conferring: degree conferring unit and year.
5. Patent: [serial number] Patent applicant. Patent name [P]. Patent country (or region): patent number and date of publication.
6. Scientific report: [serial number] author. Report title [R]. Number and place of publication: publisher and year of publication. Start and end page numbers.
7. Standard: [serial number] standard number, standard name. Date of promulgation.
8. Newspaper article: [serial number] author. Title. Name of newspaper, year-month-day (edition).
9. Electronic document: [serial number] Principal. Title of electronic document [identification and carrier type of electronic document]. Source or available address, date of publication or update/date of reference of the electronic document (optional).
10. Various undefined files: [serial number] Principal. Document title [Z]. Place of publication: publisher, year of publication.
;