And I am inclined to this statement, I think it is more practical under the usual understanding.
According to historical data, from the end of World War II to 1975, the global climate gradually became cold, and then from 1975 to 2000, the climate became warmer. From 2000 to 20 10, the climate was not driven by continuous warming. Some experts believe that the climate has begun to get colder.
Let's analyze the above data. You can find that after the end of World War II, the industry developed at a high speed, emitting a lot of carbon dioxide, but the climate did not get warmer. On the contrary, from 75 years later to 2000, the temperature rose, and then until now, the temperature has not changed. It can be seen that the climate has a curve fluctuation process, which is about 25 years. This has nothing to do with carbon dioxide. Because if the increase of carbon dioxide will lead to an increase in temperature, there will be no process of temperature cooling after the end of World War II.
Then let's talk about carbon dioxide. Theoretically, carbon dioxide is indeed a kind of "insulation gas", but what I want to say is that the carbon dioxide emitted by human beings is actually very insignificant. The content of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is 0.054%. The carbon dioxide produced by bacteria and fallen leaves is about 654.38+050 billion tons every year. Human-related activities, including breathing and automobile exhaust, are produced every year.
Moreover, from the study of the surface of ice samples, there are many ice ages and high temperature periods on the earth, but this is obviously different from the level of carbon dioxide content. Historically, the temperature always reached its peak several centuries after it reached its peak, but after it reached its peak, it gradually became cold.
The researchers concluded that during the high temperature period, due to the gradual increase of temperature, a large amount of carbon dioxide in the ocean was released, resulting in a high carbon dioxide content. When the temperature gradually decreases, the release of carbon dioxide will gradually stop until it is not released, and finally carbon dioxide will be "recycled", so the temperature will be different from the carbon dioxide content.
From this conclusion, we can find that our previous understanding that carbon dioxide causes high temperature has no scientific basis. The final answer is that temperature affects the content of carbon dioxide.
In addition, when it comes to heat preservation gas, the heat preservation effect of carbon dioxide is actually poor. Who is worse than it? Worse than water vapor, much worse ~ ~
Then look at the theory of authoritative meteorologists interviewed by BBC.
The universe is full of cosmic rays, which are thought to come from supernova explosions (experts say they have been captured). When rays enter the earth's surface, because the earth's surface is 70% water, it will accelerate the separation of water molecules, and a large amount of water vapor will evaporate into the atmosphere and gather into clouds. If the clouds are thick enough, it will really form a "greenhouse effect": the clouds will block the radiation that wants to reflect back to the universe and return to the atmosphere. So, what really affects the climate is actually the cloud.
The "cosmic rays" that affect the clouds are also unstable, which involves the sun.
As we all know, when sunspots erupt, the solar wind will form, just like waves, which will have an impact on cosmic rays. If the solar wind is strong, cosmic rays that should have entered the earth will be washed away. At this time, the clouds on the earth will be few and thin, the atmosphere will not be insulated, and the climate will be relatively cold. On the contrary, the solar wind is weak, cosmic rays are strong after all, and clouds will be added, so that the heat insulation effect of the atmosphere will be better.
It is said that authoritative experts have compared the laws of solar activity with the climate of the earth, which is said to be consistent.
Then it is linked with politics and economy.
Professor Geng Youlang and BBC programs, as well as my own reading materials afterwards, all say that the global climate problem originated in Britain and was initiated by the famous first female prime minister Margaret Thatcher. Because there was acid rain in Britain during her campaign, she put forward the campaign slogan of global environmental degradation and protection, which just catered to the psychology of two people. First, after World War II, because of the existence of the atomic bomb, human beings blindly knew that they had great power and thought they could be destroyed. The second is the fear of "having great power", which in turn will be destroyed by your own strength. So Thatcher took advantage of this slogan and became the first female prime minister in Britain. This law will be widely used by politicians in various countries in various political and economic fields, especially in the economic field.
According to Professor Lang Xianping's "six plus one industrial chain model", I understand why the west is rich and China is poor.
Please allow me to extract an article by Professor Lang.
Why is it so difficult for China enterprises? Don't entrepreneurs in China study hard? Not frugal enough? Is it because our employees are not knowledgeable enough? Neither! The proportion of college students in China ranks among the top in the world. But because of this economic war, the advantages of China's manufacturing industry, such as the advantages of labor costs, will disappear. What is "industrial chain war"? Let's take Barbie dolls produced in Zhejiang as an example. The ex-factory price of Barbie dolls is 1 USD, which is $9.9 in Wal-Mart. How is the retail price of 10 USD minus the ex-factory price of 1 USD created?
His creative process is the concept of "big logistics", which includes the following six parts: first, product design; Second, the procurement of raw materials; Third, storage and transportation; Fourth, order processing; Fifth, wholesale operation; Sixth, terminal retail. These six pieces created a value of 9 dollars, while our manufacturing industry created a value of 65,438+0 dollars. And do you know what the characteristics of manufacturing are? That is to waste resources, destroy the environment, exploit the labor force and create the value of 1 USD; And those six big pieces, without destroying the environment and exploiting the labor force, created a value of 9 dollars. China entrepreneurs worked hard, creating an output value of one million yuan, while creating a value of nine million dollars for the United States. Therefore, the more China's economy grows, the richer the United States will be! You're making a wedding dress and working for someone else, and we don't even know it, so we call it a manufacturing power. Poor thing! This is the so-called international division of labor difference. Our root is the wrong positioning of the industrial chain!
This is the "six plus one" theory put forward by Professor Lang Xianping, a famous Hong Kong economist. We in China are "one" of six plus one, and they are "six". Since the victory of World War II and the Cold War, the United States, mainly the United States, has established a "six plus one industrial chain" of wealth distribution in partnership with other pro-American western European and Japanese countries, and divided the "six plus one industrial chain" as a victorious country.
In fact, I think what Professor Lang said is actually inappropriate. He said it was a "mistake" in the positioning of our industrial chain. Is it really a mistake? I don't think so. I don't think we're going the wrong way, but there's hardly any other way. I think that the United States won Germany and Japan in World War II, the Cold War defeated the Soviet Union, and the whole world entered the rules of the game formulated by the United States and its allies. As long as China wants to connect with the international community, it must accept this game mode. In this model, China is defined as "one" country. On the one hand, China should develop, on the other hand, it should accept the "rules of the game". On the other hand, if it wants to develop, it can only strive to develop and save.
When accumulating strength, the United States and its allies are not without vigilance, and they will try their best to remain vigilant at all times. If climate warming is really a scam, then the purpose of this lie must be that western countries want to freeze the industrial chain of third world countries in the "one" link.
So to sum up, climate warming is a rogue behavior made by big countries to protect their control in the industrial chain. It is the exploitation of developing countries by naked modern imperialism.