Current location - Training Enrollment Network - Books and materials - What are the types of correcting mistakes in Chinese college entrance examination?
What are the types of correcting mistakes in Chinese college entrance examination?
1: Incorrect word order

Improper word order mainly includes the following types:

1, many attributives of noun affixes are out of order;

2. The adverbial word order of verb appendages is incorrect;

3. Improper placement of function words; In particular, the phrase "ba" is in the wrong position.

1) Noun Appendix: Many attributives are not in the right word order. The correct order of multiple attributes can usually be arranged in the following order:

A. it refers to nature or time and place;

B. reference phrases or quantitative phrases;

C. verbs or verb phrases;

D. adjectives or adjective phrases;

E. nouns or noun phrases. In addition, the attribute with "de" is placed before the attribute without "de".

2) Verb appendix. Many adverbials are out of order. The arrangement of complex adverbials is roughly as follows:

A. Object-object phrases indicating purpose or reason;

B. indicating the time or place;

C. expressing mood (adverb) or object (prepositional phrase);

D. expressive or procedural. In addition, the object-object phrase usually comes immediately before the head language.

2. Improper collocation

Improper collocation mainly includes the following types: improper collocation of subject and predicate, improper collocation of verb and object, improper collocation of decorative words and head words, improper collocation of one side and two sides, improper collocation of negation and affirmation.

(1) Improper collocation of subject and predicate

(2) Improper collocation of verbs and objects

(3) The adverbial and the head word are not collocated properly

(4) One side and two sides are not properly matched.

(5) Improper collocation of negation and affirmation.

3. Incomplete ingredients

Composition defects mainly include the following categories: lack of subject, lack of predicate, lack of object and lack of modifier.

(1) Missing theme

(2) lack of predicates

(3) Lack of objects

(4) Lack of modifying ingredients

4. Component redundancy

Redundant components mainly include the following categories: stacking, duplication, distributable, and the word "de" should be deleted.

(1) stack

(2) Repetition

(3) dispensable

(4) The word "de" should be deleted.

5. The structure is chaotic

Structural confusion, also known as sentence mixing, mainly includes the following types: indecision, broken line, midway change, anti-objectivity, and ambiguous structure.

(1) indecisive

(2) The last part of a well-structured sentence serves as the beginning of another sentence.

(3) Change course halfway-halfway through a word, suddenly start a new stove and start again.

(4) Oppose the object-use the components other than the subject of the first half of the sentence as the subject of the second half, so it is entangled.

(5) The structure is ambiguous-such a sentence can have two meanings.

6. The meaning is unknown

There are two types of semantic fuzziness:

"Difficult to understand", "difficult to understand" refers to a sentence that I don't know how to say;

Ambiguity and ambiguity are two meanings of a sentence.

1, puzzling

Step 2 be vague

(1) Two explanations, one wrong.

Both explanations are possible.

(3) Lead readers astray.

This kind of mistake is literally unambiguous, but the author's intention.

7: illogical

Here, we must first define the extension of "illogical" in sick sentences. First of all, "grammar is not logic", such as "white horse is not a horse", the sentence structure is correct and logically correct. The concepts of "white horse" and "horse" are a genus relationship. But from the literal meaning of Chinese, "white horse" should be "horse".

Secondly, language is a tool of communication. Although some words can't be said with strict logic, everyone says so and understands its meaning. There is no misunderstanding between the two parties. From the standpoint of grammar, we have to admit that it is correct. For example, "very lively" originally means very lively, but in fact it means "very lively", and even the degree will deepen. Neither of these is "illogical".

The "illogical" here means that the meaning of a sentence cannot be said in reason. For example, "learning has attitudes and methods." This sentence is the same as "there are animals, plants and microorganisms in the form", but "animals, plants and microorganisms" add up to "biology", while "attitude" and "method" add up to "knowledge", so this sentence is "illogical". Here are some logically problematic types.

There are mainly the following kinds of illogicality: self-contradiction, unclear scope, imposed factors and inversion of subject and object.

1, contradiction

2. The scope is not clear

3. Imposing factors

4. inversion of subject and object