Judging from the words of the Argentine poet Herbos, "Heaven is like a library", it is "* * * learned" to compare a library to heaven. According to the meaning of this sentence, the library under normal management is at its best, and so is heaven. Instead of the other way around, we should "regulate" the behavior of library readers according to what heaven looks like in our minds. The Shenzhen Library is newly opened. Quite a few are not here to read books. Many readers are more comfortable, which gives reporters the opportunity to be moral priests. Yesterday in the local newspaper in Shenzhen, there was an article about how slippers and nightdresses went into the library to eat, drink and lie down. The reporter "appealed to the public not to turn the elegant palace into a noisy city", took many "uncivilized" photos, and said, "The first-class environment of the library has many similar criticisms. For example, it is reported that young readers under the age of 0/4 refused to enter the library. One of the reasons is that young readers are too noisy. In the library, readers are polite and taciturn, just reading and doing nothing else, and journalists and managers may be satisfied. But is this library still a paradise in the eyes of citizens? A civilized society is characterized by discipline and tolerance. Only with full tolerance can the library become a temple of civilization. However, many of our librarians don't like tolerance and like to regulate other people's behavior. Librarians who lack humanistic spirit may use regulations such as "prohibition" to regulate, while those who think they have humanistic spirit may euphemistically "discourage" readers. However, I wonder if we have considered another problem when we do this: in the library. Who can make such standards? Who can guarantee that his standards will not infringe on readers' right to enjoy library services? Some people may say that it is forbidden to interfere with others' reading, but we know that infringing on individual rights in the name of the majority is the root of most "uncivilized" in history. So when I see the diversity of library readers, I will have a feeling of "paradise". When I see all the readers reading in unison, I will admire them, but I won't feel "paradise". It is said that Shanghai Library. Well, it shows that they regard the library as their home. I haven't verified the authenticity of this passage with director Wu, but it has become a reason for my sincere admiration for Wu. The day before yesterday in Jiading Pavilion, I noticed that librarians and readers were very tolerant of readers who looked like migrant workers, put their feet on the sofa armrest and took off their shoes and socks. Only with this inclusive library can they become a barrier-free paradise. In the news that children are forbidden to enter the Shenzhen Library, I agree with one reason, that is, safety. I saw the new Shenzhen Library before it was fully built, and I feel that it is really not suitable for people who lack the ability to act responsibly. But I think other reasons are not enough, especially the reason that "the library is noisy at will, which affects other readers" and "readers' self-borrowing and returning equipment is regarded as a' game machine' by many curious children". It should be the responsibility of public libraries to help children overcome their fear of "adult" libraries by allowing and even encouraging them to learn to use self-service equipment. It is hoped that after the upsurge of open library visits, the managers of the application for plans can reconsider the problem of "rejection", and children should be allowed or even encouraged to visit the application for plans under the leadership of the person in charge to feel or simulate the use of the most advanced equipment, so as to expand our future readers. It's hard to imagine that a library has so many entry restrictions.