The "Decision of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on Several Major Issues Concerning Comprehensively Advancing the Rule of Law" (hereinafter referred to as the "Decision"), which was deliberated and adopted by the Fourth Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee, pointed out that governments at all levels should persist in working under the leadership of the Party and on the track of the rule of law, and speed up the construction of a government ruled by law with scientific functions, statutory powers and responsibilities, strict law enforcement, openness and fairness, honesty and efficiency, and law-abiding for all. Taking the opportunity of studying and implementing the spirit of the Fourth Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee is not only an objective requirement to comprehensively promote the rule of law and build a China ruled by law, but also a realistic need to improve the government's own construction and management level.

First, fully perform government functions according to law. Administration according to law is the core of the construction of a government ruled by law and the lifeline of government work. The "Decision" pointed out that governments at all levels should fully perform government functions in accordance with the law, promote the legalization of institutions, functions, authorities, procedures and responsibilities, and further implement the government power list system. The essence of administration according to law is that the functions and powers are statutory, and the government functions are defined in legal form. To fully perform government functions according to law, we must improve the administrative system according to law, insist on using the system to manage affairs and people, perform our duties in strict accordance with legal authority and procedures, and ensure the effective implementation of laws and administrative regulations; Strengthen the assessment of the implementation of major decisions, the performance of departmental responsibilities, the promotion of key tasks and the government's own construction, strengthen administrative accountability, improve the error correction system, and continuously improve the government's credibility and execution; Further implement the power list system, so as to achieve legal authority, clear boundaries, clear subjects and open operation.

Second, constantly improve the decision-making mechanism according to law. The "Decision" pointed out that it is necessary to improve the decision-making mechanism according to law, take public participation, expert argumentation, risk assessment, legality review and collective discussion decisions as legal procedures for major administrative decisions, establish a review mechanism for the legality of major decisions within administrative organs, and establish a lifelong accountability system for major decisions. And the accountability mechanism. First, it is necessary to establish a collective decision-making system, improve the administrative decision-making procedure system, improve the decision-making transparency system, establish a major decision-making expert demonstration and risk assessment system, and continuously improve the government's decision-making ability and level; Second, attach importance to the supervisory role of legal institutions in promoting administration according to law, actively play the role of examination and supervision, actively play the role of legal adviser of staff assistants, actively play the role of examination and control of major legal affairs of the government, and provide support for the government's decision-making according to law; The third is to establish a supervision mechanism and improve the accountability mechanism. In accordance with the requirements of responsibilities, standards and deadlines, we should ensure the implementation of various decisions. Those who fail to implement government decisions and decisions as required should be held accountable, given administrative accountability, change their work style and improve administrative execution.

Third, deepen the reform of the administrative law enforcement system. The Decision points out that it is necessary to deepen the reform of the administrative law enforcement system and improve the linkage mechanism between administrative law enforcement and criminal justice. To deepen the reform of administrative law enforcement system, we should improve the administrative law enforcement system, aiming at establishing an authoritative and efficient administrative law enforcement system with unified powers and responsibilities; Improve administrative law enforcement procedures, formulate specific law enforcement rules, and standardize discretion standards and operating procedures; Adhere to strict and standardized fair and civilized law enforcement, punish all kinds of illegal acts according to law, strengthen law enforcement in key areas that are related to the vital interests of the masses, establish and improve the benchmark system of administrative discretion, and fully implement the responsibility system for administrative law enforcement; Take strengthening the legal supervision function of procuratorial organs as the path, promote the construction of the linkage mechanism between administrative law enforcement and criminal justice, and ensure that administrative law enforcement organs strictly enforce the law; Strict administrative law enforcement personnel management system, gradually implement the performance appraisal system of administrative law enforcement, and scientifically and reasonably design the evaluation index system.

Fourth, strengthen the restriction and supervision of administrative power. The "Decision" pointed out that it is necessary to strengthen the restriction and supervision of administrative power and improve the accountability mechanism for error correction. In order to strengthen the restriction and supervision of administrative power, we must strengthen inner-party supervision and improve various supervision measures within the party, including the system of reporting on work and honesty, the system of reporting on major events, the system of personal income declaration, the system of clean government files, and the system of democratic appraisal. Improve the status of power supervision institutions, focus on establishing the core of NPC legal supervision, and highlight the independence of special supervision departments that perform judicial supervision functions, such as discipline inspection and supervision, auditing, and judicial organs; Improve the social supervision mechanism, comprehensively promote the openness of government affairs, and promote the openness of decision-making, implementation, management, service and results; Strengthen the overall efficiency of administrative supervision and build a strict and complete network mechanism of power supervision.