Why did 1 Lou give you a simple answer? Look carefully, he is from the Lawyers' Union, and a lawyer with a fee will explain it to you in detail, hehe.
And I don't think this lawyer's law is so good. I don't think this kind of behavior or a case constitutes infringement at all.
The reason for this is the following：
Let's take criminal law as an example.
According to article 2 17 of China's criminal law (crime of copyright infringement):
For the purpose of making profits, anyone who commits any of the following cases of copyright infringement, with a relatively large amount of illegal income or other serious circumstances, shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years or criminal detention, and shall also, or shall only, be fined; If the amount of illegal income is huge or there are other particularly serious circumstances, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than seven years and shall also be fined:
(1) Reproduction and distribution of written works, music, movies, television and video works, computer software and other works without the permission of the copyright owner;
(2) Publishing books with exclusive publishing rights enjoyed by others;
(3) Reproduction and distribution of audio and video products made by the producer without the permission of the producer;
(4) producing or selling works of art with forged signatures of others.
In fact, the above has little to do with you. I want to explain it with copyright law.
If you plan to buy VIP articles through legal channels, you have actually paid the fees of the copyright owner and the copyright owner. This article certainly belongs to you. The netizen mailed it, but it was not publicly reproduced or released online; This is the same as buying a book and lending it to a friend. I think this metaphor is very vivid and correct. Can I say that I bought a book, and my father wants to read it, and I can only lend it to him with the consent of the copyright owner? What a joke! ! !
The copyright owner has no reason to sue this kind of behavior. I spend money to buy your article online; I have the right to use and transfer. I can show it to whoever I want, as long as I don't publish this article online or publicly.
, I don't infringe!
In addition, if you buy a book and you photocopy it for a friend, strictly speaking, printing is illegal; It doesn't matter if you lend him the book.
Buying VIP articles from the starting point through legal means, without the consent of the copyright owner, netizens hope to get this book, so sending it to multiple netizens by email does not constitute infringement.