1. The Analects of Confucius recommended by me, as a series edition of Chinese studies, is not as good as Yang Bojun's Annotations on the Analects of Confucius, but there are no problems in annotation and translation, and there is also a sage's wisdom, which is the experience of some editors and the background of this statement. Except for some simple ones, almost every Analects of Confucius has it. Suitable for beginners, but Zhuangzi is not systematic. It's awkward to read. . . However, we can try to annotate and translate Chen Guying's Zhuangzi, and then try to interpret nan huaijin's Zhuangzi after reading the original. And it is not recommended to show Lao Tzu to the world. . Typical simplicity and complexity. . . . So Zhuangzi and Laozi can try Chen Guying's Annotation and Translation of Zhuangzi and Laozi's Annotation and Comment.
2.
Qian Mu's New Interpretation of The Analects of Confucius
Attachment: If you want to know more about Confucius, I recommend How Confucius was Tempered-Lecture Room-Bao Pengshan.