Hu Hengjiang said that he committed a crime on impulse. After investigation, Hu Ceng made it clear that he was determined to kill the victim after the second conflict, and specially bought tools for this purpose. On the day of the crime, he took tools to the study room to wait for a conversation, which was obviously a premeditated and prepared crime. As for Hu Hengjiang's confession that Tan threatened Hu verbally, but there is no other evidence to prove it, the facts that Tan threatened Hu mentioned in Li's testimony all came from Hu's retelling and could not be proved.

The court held that Hu Hengjiang's behavior constituted the crime of intentional homicide, and the facts of the original judgment were clear, the evidence was sufficient and the conviction was accurate. Although the defendant has surrendered himself, the circumstances of the crime are particularly bad, the subjective viciousness is extremely deep, the criminal means are particularly cruel, and the criminal consequences are serious, which is not enough to give him a lighter punishment. The court adopted the opinion of the protest organ and should sentence Hu Hengjiang to death and execute it immediately.