Current location - Training Enrollment Network - Books and materials - Could the mystery of the existence of the snow monster in the Himalayas be the offspring of ancient apes?
Could the mystery of the existence of the snow monster in the Himalayas be the offspring of ancient apes?
No matter the information from the Caucasus, Pamirs, Mongolian Plateau and Himalayas, it is said that there are real snowmen activities, and most of the information proves that snowmen belong to the family. Dr Mara Checli, a British anthropologist, thinks that the snowman is descended from Neanderthals. In other words, the snowman is between man and ape. Dr. Xie Kelei studied the big footprints left by the snowman in the snow and pointed out that his big toes were short and turned out slightly. Cerne Qi, an anthropologist in the former Soviet Union, also believed that the snowman was a descendant of Nepalis, saying that Nepalis were losing ground in the struggle against Homo sapiens. One of them escaped to the top of the snowy mountain and became a snowman.

Mr. Zhou Guoxing, an anthropologist in China, believes that the snowman is the descendant of the great ape. He compared the footprints of the snowman and the ape, and thought that the snowman was more like an ape. The legendary snowman walks upright, crawling and sprinting when frightened-much like Archaeopteryx. He speculated that the ancient great ape was not really extinct, and its descendants lurked between the snow-capped mountains and ice peaks in southeastern Europe and Asia, becoming mysterious snowmen. But they have no language function, and only make vague calls. Therefore, it seems that they have not yet entered the threshold of mankind.

Some scholars deny the existence of snowman. They think that the footprints of the legendary snowman may be the footprints of bears, or they may be caused by stones falling from the mountains after the snow melts. The Sikkim government once organized a special investigation team to inspect the foothills of Jiafeng Mountain, the third-highest arid city in the world, which is said to be frequented by snowmen, but found nothing. 1959, an American snowman expedition also visited Nepal for one and a half months, and found no traces of snowman. In a word, the riddle of the snowman, like the riddle of bigfoot, is both unbelievable and hard to deny easily. Does it also belong to the category of "hypothesis science"?