In the plot of Stockholm, prisoners began to sympathize with each other because of empathy, and gradually developed feelings, linking fate with criminals and willing to sacrifice themselves to get each other out of trouble. This is an unconscious self-sacrifice and self-abuse. She wants to save each other.

In the 20 17 movie version, Bell falls in love with a monster, which is actually a bit like Elizabeth falling in love with Mr. Darcy in Pride and Prejudice. Elizabeth loves Darcy partly because of her personality and wisdom, and partly because she fell in love with the picturesque pangbo Manor. Bell likes wild animals. At first, she was fascinated by the wildlife castle (the library in the library), and later she was attracted by a lot of reading and deep thinking about wildlife. In short, his material conditions and spiritual realm are what she yearns for. Her love can be said to be himself, higher than that of a young woman in a small town. With her, I have books to read, ideas to exchange and a relatively comfortable life.

In addition, I remember that in the movie, when the furniture talked about their situation, it didn't mention that if someone fell in love with the monster, they could bring it back. Bell just said, "Don't worry, go to bed early." So Bell didn't know that she could save him. How can she say that Stockholm syndrome is incompatible with water and fire?

Good people love people, and bad people need comfort, so he goes back to sympathize with the bad people. Good people praise good people with good, and evil people please evil people with evil.