The rights and dignity of citizens are not universally guaranteed. We can see that beggars are "centralized" in management and behavior restrictions.
② Social equality may be just a slogan in some fields. Words such as "high-end readers", "elite", "beggars and scavengers" and "city managers" expose inequality (hierarchical concept).
The management and services of many libraries are worrying. The materials show that the library hardware has been improved, but the library cause has not made due progress. The library should change from the old self-centered model to the new public-centered model.
④ The values of "social elites" are biased and even selfish. "High-end readers" choose to leave, and "elites" put forward "threshold conditions", exposing the trend of being divorced from the people. Not many elites like Shuqing Chu, curator of Hangtu, are popular with the public.
The reading situation of China people is worrying. It is a common phenomenon that libraries stick to it in the cold and cheerless.
Discrimination against the bottom people does not only happen to the "elite". Many things happened around us in the materials, and the tolerance and indifference of the public contributed to the persistence of this trend.
⑦ There is still room for improvement in the service quality of public welfare undertakings. "If there is a heaven, it should be like a library." This sentence is exciting and depressing. I hope more people dare to say, "I have no right to refuse them to study at school, but you have the right to choose to leave."
(Depth is not the decisive factor of the answer, and the angle of inquiry is not limited to the above. You can score if the deduction makes sense. )