Since it is an institution, there will definitely be a research summary and some merits. Of course, the more desirable, the higher the institutional level; On the contrary, the more unreliable it is, the specific screening method will be provided later. The essence of application is to examine the understanding and analysis of words, so we must combine our own thinking.
A good answer to the application must be the most consistent with the requirements of the topic and the most faithful to the content of the material. At the end of applied learning, we can write our most satisfactory answers to several questions, and basically we can get high marks when we arrive at the examination room. The most satisfying thing is not subjective feelings. Specific evaluation methods are as follows, mainly including four levels:
First, whether the main points are in line with the meaning of the question. This is the simplest point, but we are the easiest to ignore. The things that seem the simplest are often the most difficult. For example, the reason why apples fall is gravity. We often see it, but we don't know why.
The same is true for judging whether the key points of the answer to the application question conform to the meaning of the question. Specifically, whether all the key points meet the requirements of the topic keywords and logical elements of the stem can be verified by reverse inference. Of course, reverse generation is read in the context of the material, and it needs to be tried several times. It is not easy to find the question in the answer at a glance.
The second is whether the main points are faithful to the materials. Whether the key words of all the answer points come from the material or are close to the expression of the material, rather than summing up a word with similar feelings by accumulating personal reserves, because it is difficult to ensure that the word meets the requirements of "accuracy" in the stem.
The third is whether the main points are comprehensive. We went to the market to find three or four answers and compared them with each other. Which points are * * *, which is easy to judge. In most cases, * * * is the standard score for answering questions. What is written here and what is not, this needs to be analyzed whether there is a basis. The method of judging the main points is still the same as the first one. Try to accomplish this, in line with the requirements of "comprehensive".
The fourth is the logic of the main points. What is the logical relationship between points? In the final answer, not all topics need to be logical, but you need to write your favorite "all-inclusive sentence" Many topics can simply list the main points of different aspects, and generally need to reflect the logical level in comprehensive analysis and implementation.