To recommend the National Science and Technology Award, you must fill in the "National Science and Technology Award Recommendation". Article 4 The recommendation department shall strictly screen the recommended projects, review the quality of reporting recommended by the National Science and Technology Awards, and review the qualifications and rankings of the main completers and units.
The recommendation department shall, according to the innovation, scientific and technological level, application and existing shortcomings of the project, clearly recommend opinions. Not according to the provisions of the format, column and title of a comprehensive list of facts, will not be accepted. Fifth China scholars and foreign scholars completed the project, the main academic ideas put forward by China scholars, scientific and technological research work is mainly completed in China, and provide relevant written materials before recommending the National Science and Technology Award. Article 6 The applied technology projects recommended for the National Technological Invention Award and the National Science and Technology Progress Award must provide the appraisal certificates issued by the Science and Technology Commission of the province, autonomous region, municipality directly under the Central Government, the relevant departments of the State Council and the scientific and technological achievements management institution of the China People's Liberation Army Headquarters, the evaluation certificates issued by the soft science research achievements, or the approval documents, test reports and other scientific and technological evaluation certificates issued by professional and technical institutions recognized by the relevant departments of the province, autonomous region, municipality directly under the Central Government and the State Council. Seventh to recommend the national technological invention award, you must obtain the second prize of the provincial (ministerial) level science and technology award (including the second prize).
The recommendation department that set up the provincial (ministerial) level technical invention award should be recommended from the project that won the second prize (including the second prize) of the provincial (ministerial) level technical invention award.
The recommendation department without a single technological invention award may recommend technological invention projects according to the conditions of the national technological invention award from the projects that have won the second prize of scientific and technological progress at the provincial (ministerial) level (including the second prize). Article 8 Where the project recommended by the National Technological Invention Award has obtained an invention patent, a copy of the invention patent certificate and the patent claim shall be provided; If a patent for invention has not been granted, a novelty search report on the innovative content of the project shall be provided in accordance with the relevant provisions. Article 9 The creative contributions of the main contributors to the National Technological Invention Award and the National Science and Technology Progress Award shall be concrete, authentic and relatively independent, and correspond to the innovation points of the project. The main completion personnel are arranged smoothly according to the contribution. Tenth recommended national technological invention award projects, the main completion of the general for 1 to 6 people. If the number of major comprehensive inventions exceeds the specified number, the recommendation department shall put forward sufficient reasons in the "National Science and Technology Award Recommendation". Eleventh national science and technology award evaluation failed projects, such as new progress, the recommendation department can recommend again according to the prescribed procedures. Twelfth national science and technology award evaluation committee shall meet the following conditions:
(a) enthusiastic about science and technology awards, to participate in national science and technology awards and other related activities.
(two) knowledgeable, familiar with the development of science and technology at home and abroad in this field, with strong comprehensive judgment ability, with senior professional and technical titles.
(three) have a good professional ethics, serious and responsible, scientific and fair.
(4) Being in good health, generally not exceeding 65 years old. Thirteenth where the National Science and Technology Award Review Committee is the main person who completed the recommended project in that year, the annual review activities shall be subject to the avoidance system. Fourteenth national science and technology award evaluation institutions at all levels believe that the core content of the project has initially met the award conditions, and some materials or supporting documents need to be supplemented, they can decide to postpone the evaluation. Fifteenth National Science and Technology Awards Office shall promptly notify the recommendation department of the postponed evaluation items and reasons. After the recommendation department has fully done the relevant work, it should submit a re-evaluation request to the National Science and Technology Awards Office at the latest before the recommendation deadline of the third year after the extension of the review. Sixteenth national science and technology awards professional (discipline) evaluation committee after the completion of the preliminary evaluation work, the State Science and Technology Commission announced the preliminary evaluation results to the public. From the date of publication, the objection period is less than 60 days, and opinions from all walks of life are widely solicited. For projects involving national security and national defense, opinions should be sought within an appropriate scope. Seventeenth objections to the project are divided into substantive objections and non-substantive objections. Opinions on the innovation, advancement and practicability of key technologies of the project and false recommendation of national science and technology awards are called substantive objections.
The opinions of the main completion unit and the main completion person of the project are called immaterial objections. Eighteenth objection period, any unit or individual holds different opinions on the preliminary evaluation results, can be put forward in writing to the State Science and Technology Award Office. Objection handling shall be carried out according to the following procedures:
(a) the substantive objection shall be coordinated by the State Science and Technology Awards Office, and the relevant recommendation departments shall provide assistance.
1. After receiving the notice of objection, the recommending department shall promptly notify the objected party to reply to the relevant objection in writing.
2. After reviewing the written materials of the dissident or the dissident, the relevant recommendation department will send the investigation, verification and opinions to the National Science and Technology Awards Office for review.
3. When the National Science and Technology Awards Office deems it necessary, it may organize judges and experts to conduct investigation and handling, and form handling opinions. After being examined and approved by the National Science and Technology Awards Review Committee, the two parties will be informed of the handling opinions.
(two) non-substantive objections are generally handled by the recommendation department, and the opinions are submitted to the State Science and Technology Awards Office for review. The handling of cross-departmental objections is coordinated by the National Science and Technology Awards Office, assisted by relevant recommendation departments, and the handling procedures refer to the entity objection handling procedures.