First of all, occupying a seat is an immoral behavior that occupies public resources. There are no laws and regulations to restrict seat occupation, but morality is completely restricting people's seat occupation behavior. Some people only think about their own interests, but they don't look at the problem from the standpoint of others. Because of my occupation, some idle seat resources have not been used, so that people who need this seat can't use it. This is obviously an unreasonable occupation of public resources and a waste. To rise to the moral problem is that one's own quality is not high and there is no morality.
When I meet someone who occupies a seat, I often boldly oppose his behavior, so that he can't occupy social resources. The first one may be insufficient demand, or, in layman's terms, insufficient seats. Some people will keep their seats for themselves for a long time, so they will put their own things on the seats as a sign that the seats are occupied and will not let others use them, even if they are not there. The lack of seats aroused people's idea of occupying seats. In some public places, especially places suitable for learning to read, because there are not enough seats, but they are afraid that they will be late, the empty seats have long since disappeared, or the situation of seat occupation has become more and more serious.
Another reason for the problem of seat occupation is that the phenomenon of seat occupation is neglected and unmanaged, and it depends entirely on the public's consciousness. Therefore, conscious people will take everything away, while unconscious people will think about their own interests and occupy seats if they want to. Seating phenomena such as libraries and study rooms abound.
In a word, I want to be an aggressive person, express my dissatisfaction with the fighting behavior when I encounter the behavior of occupying a seat, actively express my thoughts and take practical actions.