But some reference books are teaching materials (they will not be taught in class, but will be used as reference books for review during the exam). I can give you some examples:
History of Western Philosophy: The English version of Oxford History of Western Philosophy (written by Anthony Kenny, although there is a Chinese translation, but the quality is not very good, so look directly at the English version, the first two volumes are better, but the last two volumes are a bit messy), while the Chinese version is A Brief History of Western Philosophy by Peking University Publishing House (written by Zhao Dunhua, the exam is often used as a reference book, but it feels obscure compared with the former ...).
History of China's Philosophy: History of China's Philosophy by Peking University Publishing House and History of China's Philosophy by Feng Youlan.
Logic: A Course of Critical Thinking, Peking University Publishing House.
Other courses, … I can't remember which courses were given textbooks and reference books. Generally give more to the original.
In addition, please note that under normal circumstances, teachers do not recommend focusing on reading the above textbook bibliography! Instead, I recommend reading the original text directly! Most teachers scoff at the "textbook" and think that the abbreviated version of "Introduction to Thought" can't grasp the philosopher's thoughts at all, and it's meaningless to read it. They will recommend (or require) you to read the original directly. For example, Plato's Republic, Aristotle's Politics, Hobbes' Leviathan and so on. There are many books, so you can directly search some philosophical books on the Internet (the general content is similar) and choose the type you like to read.
If you are a middle school student, the above textbooks may be too difficult for you. I think you can read some introductory philosophical books: a general history of western philosophy, such as Sophie's World. If you read the original works, Plato's dialogues such as Fido and Aristotle's books are relatively simple (Greek books are relatively easy to understand, and the more modern they are, the more difficult it is for Descartes, Kant and Hobbes to read the original works), but modern Rousseau and Hobbes are puzzled. In Zhong Zhe's words, books such as The Analects of Confucius in the original work can look at the thoughts in the period when a hundred schools of thought contend, but the metaphysics and neo-Confucianism behind them are more difficult to understand. I don't know much about the overview ... if it's simple, there should be some bibliographies introducing Chinese studies. ...