Since the implementation of this measure, it has always caused dissatisfaction among some readers. In fact, there is nothing in this news. Since it is "public", beggars can also enjoy it. The problem is that Hangzhou Library's "this move has been causing some readers' dissatisfaction since its implementation" is somewhat innovative. Who is "dissatisfied"? I understand that "dissatisfied" people think they are "noble" people. How can a "noble" person sit with a "humble" beggar? Are you afraid that beggars will dirty their "nobility" and tarnish their image, or do you think beggars are not scholars at all and should beg? Yunshu Qing, director of Hangzhou Library, put it well: "I have no right to refuse them to study in it, but you have the right to choose to leave." First of all, public libraries are public places open to all. Since it is all the people, it certainly includes all the people. There is no distinction between high and low, and high and low is a variable. Today's nobility may be lower tomorrow. From this perspective, beggars who come in today cannot be said to become scientists or entrepreneurs tomorrow through the cultivation of knowledge. Furthermore, the public library is not only a place to consult literature, but also a space for citizens to walk freely. Even if beggars don't want to study, they just want to come in and have a rest. Why not enjoy the coolness of hot days and the warmth of winter? Therefore, it is right to "have no right to refuse them in", while those who don't want to sit with beggars "have the right to choose to leave". By extension, how many public libraries in China can be like Hangzhou Library? How many public places can accept beggars and scavengers with confidence? Public places in many places are not even willing to develop migrant workers. I really don't know whether they think migrant workers are dirty or have low status. The reason why public places are "public" should be "public" and "public". Public places belong to the whole people, not just to the "nobles". Everyone knows the simple truth, but some people just regard it as news. No wonder Liu Lidong, director of the Office of Cartography, said, "Is this news? We have always felt that this is the responsibility of public libraries. " In fact, it is regarded as news because there are indeed many public places that have not fulfilled their due responsibilities, so the practice of Hangzhou Library has a benchmark news function. Those who sincerely want to enjoy the service in public places should include beggars and scavengers. I sincerely hope that the practice of Hangzhou Library is no longer news. Disclaimer: All works marked "Source: Huasheng Online" are original works of Huasheng Online. Please be sure to mark "Source and Author's Signature" when reprinting. Anyone who violates the above statement will be held accountable by this website.