Judging from the news released on the website of the Ministry of Education, they will add several standards to the evaluation of undergraduate education. Among them, the most striking thing is the addition of negative evaluation list. Many netizens, especially some college students, are curious when they see this news. What does this negative list do? As we all know, in order to improve the quality of our students to the greatest extent, the undergraduate enrollment is constantly expanding, but under the premise of ensuring the quantity, our quality is showing a downward trend. Today, we will discuss the benefits of the negative list evaluation of undergraduate education of the Ministry of Education.

First, it can play a good warning role.

I believe many undergraduates have such a consciousness that they can graduate smoothly by submitting their graduation design. Obviously, the Ministry of Education is gradually strengthening the audit system for undergraduates. Simply submitting graduation design or defense can't directly make them graduate smoothly. After graduation, they will continue to carry out auditing and sampling inspection system. In addition to these, there is also a negative evaluation, which means that teachers and schools need to affirm before graduation can be truly realized. This kind of action can play a good warning role, so that students can understand that simple graduation design can not make them graduate smoothly.

Second, improve their moral quality.

In this negative evaluation list, in fact, the most important point is the moral and cultural construction of students. As we all know, our times are developing rapidly. Many people are exposed to some fresh food every day, but under such circumstances, our moral and cultural construction has obviously failed to keep up with the progress of material culture. Under such circumstances, schools, as ivory towers, naturally have the obligation and responsibility to cultivate students' moral cultivation.

Third, improve students' comprehensive quality.

I have to say that as an undergraduate, I also entered the university at this stage of enrollment expansion. If it hadn't been for the expansion of enrollment, I might not have been admitted to an undergraduate college. But at the same time, I also understand that students who get low marks are really mixed, and the most common performance in school is muddling along. Under such circumstances, some people who can graduate are actually not excellent talents. In order to promote the progress of education, the state has actually invested a lot of manpower and material resources, but it has not achieved online results. Therefore, this negative evaluation can improve the quality of our undergraduate graduates to a certain extent.