The second problem is that the bookstore's sales behavior is controlled by the distribution right. If the bookstore fails to fulfill its duty of care and sells pirated books, it will bear the responsibility. If you do your duty of care, you will not be liable (but it is still infringement).
The third question, "coffee shops providing books for guests does not constitute infringement. As long as you buy a genuine book, you have the right to show it to others with or without pay. The copyright law does not stipulate that such behavior is an infringement. " I don't think this answer upstairs is appropriate. Renting genuine books without permission can also be regarded as copyright infringement, but even if you buy pirated books and lend them to your classmates, it does not constitute infringement. The reason why this problem is not infringing comes from the provisions of China's copyright law. Providing books for reading free of charge, although it transfers the ownership of books, China's distribution refers to the right to provide the public with the originals or copies of works, with the purpose of transferring the ownership of the originals or copies (but not necessarily, as long as there is the possibility of ownership transfer), so this behavior of coffee shops does not meet this requirement, and the act of renting is for profit. This kind of behavior is only an indirect profit-making behavior, so it will be fair and just, and it is difficult to rent. However, it may be within the scope of the adjustment of broad distribution rights in other countries.